Who will be most affected by Social Distancing?

Who will be most affected by Social Distancing?

Data & intelligence: An essential tool for the public sector in these unprecedented times

As we move into the ‘delay’ phase of the Government’s action plan to tackle the Coronavirus outbreak, those who work for organisations that have implemented appropriate business continuity plans will be working from home to keep ‘business as usual’.

This is clearly great for those who can work in this way, however what can be done to support businesses (and their employees) who operate in sectors who are directly affected by the significant changes imposed on our everyday lives? Although the Government’s plans are still evolving, the Chancellor’s package of financial support available to business during this period have been widely welcomed.

But what about low income renters or at risk and vulnerable community groups such as the over seventies, those with underlying health conditions or those who already feel socially isolated? As these groups are likely to face the biggest challenge during this difficult period, who is responsible for their wellbeing and what provisions will be made to ensure they are supported throughout?

Given that the Government has said that Councils will be fully funded for coronavirus costs, it is highly likely that local authorities alongside their colleagues in public health and the wider integrated care system will be on hand to support these community groups. But what does the public sector know about who they are, where they are and how to reach them?

The increasing role of data and intelligence in resource planning and targeting

Data and intelligence is already an essential tool for the public sector to help understand the demographic, lifestyle, behavioural and health characteristics of residents when prioritising and delivering services. Over the coming weeks and months data and intelligence will increasingly play an integral part of resource planning and targeting as the true impact of social distancing is felt by us all, particularly those who will feel the affect of social isolation more.

The use of data is also supported by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Matt Hancock who tweeted “Public information: GDPR does not inhibit use of data for coronavirus response. GDPR has a clause excepting work in the overwhelming public interest. No one should constrain work on responding to coronavirus due to data protection laws.”

This is further supported by the news that US Government officials are currently in discussion with a number of tech companies, including Facebook and Google, around how data from cell phones might provide methods for combating the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

The Government has already published guidance on social distancing for everyone in the UK, particularly older people and vulnerable adults. But what can data and intelligence really tell us about these groups and how can this be used to assist with meaningful action?

Using data to understand the impact, and the affect on services

Data will allow you to understand the likely numbers involved, assess the impact of the measures so that you can see just how much this will affect services. For example, according to CACI’s current population estimates the UK population is currently just over 67 million and of that 13.7% are aged over 70. That means the Government is asking some 9 million people to self-isolate regardless of their medical conditions. In addition, analysis has shown that the largest proportion of the population aged over 70 can be found in rural authorities rather than those covering urban areas.

Top six local authorities by percentage of population over 70

If we specifically look at those who are aged seventy or over with diabetes and living alone, the health and wellbeing characteristics (Wellbeing Acorn) of these people indicate that they are three times more likely to have the biggest health challenges in the UK. They are also likely to be taking four or more prescribed medicines with many treating issues concerning cardio-vascular, gastrointestinal, the central nervous system and the endocrine system. Incidence of smoking is high with spending on tobacco at almost 70% above average resulting in higher rates of breathlessness, asthma and cancer. Their increased exposure to the health services means they are more likely to engage with multiple NHS departments. Furthermore, many of these people live in deprived neighbourhoods containing many social renting pensioners in high rise flats. They are also members of local residents or social groups and they like to talk to their neighbours.  Despite this, they are more than twice the national average not have someone who will listen nor anyone who can help in a crisis.

This intelligence is key to understanding the needs of these vulnerable and at-risk groups, assessing the demand and subsequent impact they may have on services as well as identify ways in which public services may be able to communicate and engage with them during this period of isolation.

For further information about CACI’s products and services mentioned in this blog, our work with data and intelligence across the public sector or if you have a specific data requirement now then please get in touch.

Utilising technology to improve SEND outcomes for children

Utilising technology to improve SEND outcomes for children

A recent case concerning Richmond council and Achieving for Children, the organisation which runs its children’s services, highlights the importance of the role that technology now plays in enacting the best outcomes for children. Three children were identified in a report by the Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman as having missed out on their education because of failings in the processes at Richmond and Achieving for Children.

You can read the Ombudsman’s report here. It highlights fundamental flaws in the process upon which SEND (special educational needs and disabilities) children receive the services to which they are entitled by law.

When the Ombudsman’s investigators visited the council to inspect case files, they found documents often named or filed incorrectly.

Additionally, the investigation found the council had three separate IT systems for managing information, one of which could only be accessed by a single member of staff. And in one of the cases, the Ombudsman’s investigation was only able to discover what had happened because the family had kept thorough records.

Investigation into complaints against London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (reference numbers: 18 001 501, 18 003 307 and 18 013 211)

Report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman – 18 October 2019

It is clear that the setup to determine and administer support for SEND children in Richmond is not able to appropriately and effectively deliver the support packages some of these children need. The multitude of issues covers disparate systems, poor administration and concentration of knowledge into a single member of staff. Effective management of information via technology and redesign of operations would go a long way to alleviating the issues outlined by the Ombudsman.

Getting the technology right, however, is only part of the puzzle and this is not an issue isolated to Richmond. IT systems need to support and empower councils in their provisions for the children under their purview. Siloed statutory requirements, limited policy guidance and resourcing do not help councils in achieving a timely and coherent response to children’s educational needs.

As the Richmond case highlights, too, compiling and interpreting relevant historical data is incredibly challenging – aligning multiple data structures to provide a holistic view of a child or young person is, in some cases, impossible.

Even where the files exist, as we can see here, they are still at the mercy of human error when it comes to labelling, storing and indexing.

So, councils are facing a number of issues in making suitable provisions for children and this is failing SEND children on a national level. This further feeds into recent findings from the London Innovation & Improvement Alliance (LIIA) that:

  • The mental health needs of children are not being sufficiently supported
  • Identification of SEND is weak
  • Outcomes for children with SEND are often poor by the age of 16

To address these underlying issues, councils need to do more work on aligning their service, practice and technology solutions to better fit the uncertainty regarding demand for the identification and support of children with SEND needs. There are, currently, some major flaws in these processes which the Richmond case serves to highlight.

School admissions made easy

School admissions made easy

Administering school admissions is one of those tasks that sounds straightforward from the outside. Parents lodge applications for their children to attend a school, plus second and third choices, the applications get reviewed against the admission criteria and spaces are assigned accordingly. Easy.

Since most people view this process from the outside, it is important that schools have transparent admissions criteria and that these are adhered to in a transparent and fair way. At a base level, schools aim to achieve 100% admissions. This needs to be achieved whilst affording parents options for their children and making clear why decisions regarding allocations have been made.

Meeting the needs of children

When you then add in the complex needs of children, from children with special educational needs and disabilities, those qualifying for the pupil premium and those who are in care, to more prosaic attributes such as proximity to the school, the attendance of a sibling or those who attended a feeder school, there are myriad complications which make school admissions anything but the straightforward exercise they can appear as from the outside.

So, how can local education authorities and schools bring simplicity to what is, at times, a highly complex and challenging task?

The role of technology

Technology has been making the process of school admissions far more straightforward. By integrating with third-party mapping apps, for example, it is far quicker to determine whether or not an applicant resides within the school’s catchment area, automatically saving a lot of time in manually checking each application for such criteria.

By using an online admissions process, schools and authorities can ensure that parents are aware of the admissions criteria and can make the process a lot simpler for them, too. By logging into a parent portal, parents can complete admissions forms online and track the status at their convenience, making the whole process more engaging, more convenient and paperless – no more filling out forms and visiting the Post Office to submit applications.

Furthermore, adhering to the Department of Education rules for which parents can apply by can be formatted into a technology solution. Then aspects such as the ordering hierarchy by which children are granted admissions can be implemented to deliver further efficiency through the process. To speed up the process further, parents can upload elements such as proof of address earlier in the process, ensuring that there is transparency throughout for both parents and administrators.

Having the data securely stored in electronic formatting reduces the need for re-keying data again further down the process and enables schools to automate vast swathes of the admissions process. Just being able to automatically detect whether or not an applicant resides within the school’s catchment area saves a lot of time in having to manually check this. This is also transparent and can be easily evidenced in the case of a dispute against an admission.

Automation

Furthermore, pupils can be linked to others, making it easier to see if their sibling(s) attend the same school that is being applied for. Other categorisations can be made when in comes to the applications of special educational needs and disabilities pupils, as well as those who qualify for the pupil premium. This offers schools a far clearer picture of who is being admitted and who is not, meaning that adjustments can be made where necessary to ensure that the relevant targets are achieved. If they are not achieved, it can be evidenced exactly why not.

Utilising technology and establishing rules within a system also reduces the risk associated with human error. Putting a workflow in place around the admissions process ensures that all steps are adhered to and all information regarding an application can be automatically produced. Rather than having to manually trawl through records, they can be found instantly. This not only expediates the process but makes it far more accurate as well.

Technology is making the schools admission process easier, faster, more accurate, more transparent and fairer.

For more information on how technology could improve your admissions process, contact us today.